Is Strange Weather in the Air or just On Air?

I came across this clip from NBC news last week which is probably one of the most one-sided reports on climate change causing extreme weather I've seen in recent weeks. It doesn't even try to balance the argument, or even suggest "on the other hand", which is surprising for a major US news network. It devotes a full 2 and a half minutes to suggesting that extreme weather events will become more likely and are a result of climate change. The video concludes by saying "today, no one can deny that extreme weather is here to stay"!

After doing a bit of digging in some journal archives, I came across this interesting paper. It looks at how extreme weather event coverage on US national television has changed over the past 50 years, and assesses whether news coverage can be used almost as a proxy as to whether extreme events are becoming more discernible.

News archives between 1968 and 1996 were used to track records of heat waves, droughts, hurricanes and floods from ABC, CBS and NBC television networks. A control period was used in order to distinguish between 'climate science' and 'global warming' frenzies that hit news and media in the late 80s. Some of the key findings are displayed on the graphs below:

Annual coverage of heat waves on the network news.

Annual coverage of floods on the network news.

Annual coverage of hurricanes on the network news.

The results show a dramatic increase in the coverage of floods and hurricanes since the 1980s, however, it must be noted that the different types of extreme events do not receive equal coverage: for example, annual peaks for droughts contain about twice as many stories as the peaks for heat waves. 

One of the key findings that the data revealed is that surprisingly there is no association between coverage of climate change and the overall coverage of extreme events. They also discovered that whilst total news coverage of extreme events in the US increases dramatically, coverage devoted to extreme events in other countries remains relatively constant (see image below).

Index of extreme weather coverage on the network news by all events and foreign events.

There are a variety of limitations with using a study such as this to show extreme events are linked to anthropogenic change. Media is always subjective and some news stories can be made at the expense of others. Some stories can often dominate the news, whilst others get left behind. Changes in technology, forecasting and the ability to track extreme weather events has also come a long way in the last 50 years and the ability to cover events and show footage will impact whether an event is covered.

Despite not a lot of concrete evidence coming out of reports such as these, it is pleasing that researchers are trying new and innovative ways of collating evidence for climate change.

Incredible Photos of Extreme Weather

I came across this website today which has a collection of some amazing photos of extreme weather events. It is well worth a quick look if you have a couple of minutes spare. They quite literally take your breath away! Here's a couple of my favourites from the site:

IPCC Special Report - Latest Findings on Extreme Weather Events

The report suggests that droughts will intensify during the 21st century

Working Groups I and II for the IPCC have produced a special report for 'Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation' (SREX for short). The findings of the Special Report were presented at the IPCC's 34th session, which is currently being held in Kampala, Uganda. The full report is not available until February 2012, but a 29 page summary has been made available and can be downloaded here.

I've listed some of the key findings below, but I would urge you to take a look at the full report yourselves:

> "A changing climate leads to changes in the frequency, intensity, spatial extent, duration, and timing of extreme weather and climate events, and can result in unprecedented extreme weather and climate events."

> There is evidence that some extremes have changed as a result of anthropogenic influences, including increases in atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases. It is likely that anthropogenic influences have led to warming of extreme daily minimum and maximum temperatures on the global scale.

> "It is likely that the frequency of heavy precipitation or the proportion of total rainfall from heavy falls will increase in the 21st century over many areas of the globe."

> "Average tropical cyclone maximum wind speed is likely to increase, although increases may not occur in all ocean basins. It is likely that the global frequency of tropical cyclones will either decrease or remain essentially unchanged."

> "There is medium confidence that droughts will intensify in the 21st century in some seasons and areas, due to reduced precipitation and/or increased evapotranspiration."

> There is high confidence that changes in heat waves, glacial retreat and/or permafrost degradation will affect high mountain phenomena such as slope instabilities, movements of mass, and glacial lake outburst floods.

The summary is very cautious with it's findings and confidence levels, stating that "Extreme events are rare, which means there are few data available to make assessments regarding changes in their frequency or intensity." As has been discussed in previous posts and seen in the current academic literature, it becomes very difficult to isolate a single event, like a heatwave or a heavy rainstorm, and say that event was caused by the human element of climate change.

Despite this, the report is yet another contribution to the scientific community suggesting that anthropogenic impacts are having a direct impact on extreme weather events.

Extreme Winters Caused by natural Solar Cycle?

Living not far outside of London growing up, the idea of a thick blanket of snow to play in on a winter's day was only ever a distant fantasy. You see it in the American movies all the time, and you soon learn that a 'white Christmas' doesn't really exist. When the snow fell in 2009, my inner child only had one thing in mind!

What's the significance of this? Well, it was the coldest winter on record in over 25 years, and the UK received record levels of snow. It would be easy to throw climate change to an extreme anomalous event such as this, but recent findings suggest an alternative...

Climate scientists at the UK Met Office have recently carried out a new study on the fluctuations of the sun's UV radiation. They attempted to create a link between solar activity and seasonal weather.

Satellite measurements were used and fluctuations in solar radiation were discovered to be five times as large as previously thought. They put their data into the Hadley Centre model and were able to show how these fluctuations affected regional weather.

The paper emphasises that there findings do not suggest a link to long-term global warming, rather that there is a real correlation between ultraviolet levels and meteorological variables. They show that there is actually little direct change in globally averaged temperatures as the solar activity drives cold winters in northern Europe and the United States, but mild winters are subsequently found over southern Europe and Canada.

How does it work?

UV is absorbed in the stratosphere (the upper atmosphere) by ozone. When there is less UV to absorb, the stratosphere is relatively cooler. The Hadley centre model shows that the effects of this percolate down through the atmosphere. It is described in the paper as a 'top-down stratosphere to troposphere pathway'. As it does this, it changes wind speeds, including the jet stream that circles the globe above Europe, Russia and North America. The resultant change is a reduced air flow from the west to the east, moving colder air into the UK and northern Europe. The image below shows these changes in wind speed and pressure between Ocotber and March 2010. There is then a re-distribution of temperatures across the region, leading to the milder winters in southern Europe and Canada.

Source

Is it quite as clear cut?

The scientists suggest that other factors may have been at play for the colder winter temperatures, including the decline of sea ice levels and El Nino. In all honesty, it could be any combination of these factors, but they suggest that the solar cycle was acting in a way to facilitate these conditions.

What's the advantages of this (other than building giant snowmen)? 

The UV measurements could be used for better forecasting. UV levels won't be able to tell us what the day-to-day weather will do, but it would enable improved forecasts for winter conditions months ahead. They would play an important role in long-term contingency planning.

In summary, the winter weather seen across the UK and Atlantic between 2009-2011 appears to back up the scientists findings. The next stage of investigation would be to look at UV measurements across a longer time-scale, to see if the patterns hold true.

165 Tornadoes in 24 Hours

The weather witnessed in Southeast US earlier this year was phenomenal. Over 600 tornadoes were recorded in April alone, breaking the previous record by several hundred. Numerous F5 tornadoes (the highest grade) with surface wind speeds greater than 200mph were also witnessed. The result was widespread and devastating destruction, including the deaths of more than 350 people. In Alabama, between 1950 and 2006, 358 people have been killed as a result of tornadoes. In the 30 day period of April 2011, 240 people were killed in Alabama.

Why so many tornadoes?

The high number of tornadoes was partly due to the Arctic Oscillation which was in a negative phase. High pressure in northern Canada, pushed the cold arctic air a long way south. On top of this, the sea surface temperatures in the Gulf of Mexico were a couple of degrees above where they should have been for the time of year.  The resulting evaporation meant warm humid air residing off the southeast coast of the US. A southerly breeze, brought this warm humid air inland, and mixed with the cold air, creating a very active weather front. In this situation, the warm air rises up above the cold air and it begins to interact with the jet stream. The jet stream was further south than it should have been and this is partly due to the La Nina phase of the ENSO oscillation. As the warm air rises and meets the cold air, almost instantaneously as a thunderstorm develops, you get the twisting motion as a result of the cold and warm air meeting with the jet stream. The twisting motion produces the tornadoes which then eventually reach the surface. The image below shows the air movements and tornado reports across April 2011.

The daily evolving 500mb heights (contours) and 850mb wind (arrows) from April 1-30, 2011.  Index: category 4 (orange) indicative of enhanced severe storm risk and category 5 (red) indicative of enhanced tornado risk. Source

A paper published in 2008 looked at whether tornado counts change location based on phase of El Nino/ Southern Oscillation. However, results found that neither frequency of tornado days nor days of violent tornados is affected systematically by the phase of ENSO for the US as a whole. Rather that ENSO only sets a ‘background stage’ for which tornado activity to occur in.

“The apparent response of organized tornado activity to ENSO phase is a nonlinear one driven by meteorological processes rather than conditions in the tropical Pacific. Neither ENSO extreme (warm nor cold phase) is related to as significant of an increase in organized tornado activity as the intermediate neutral phase is.”

Currently further research is required into the contribution of La Nina, and NOAA observational sources suggest that the tropical sea surface temperature conditions played a much larger role in what was witnessed in April 2011.

Anthropogenic Climate Change and Tornadoes

In order to assess long term climate trends, reliable long term data is required, which makes the assessment of tornadoes and climate change difficult. The US Climate Change Synthesis Report SAP 3.3 concludes that:

"The data used to examine changes in the frequency and severity of tornadoes and severe thunderstorms are inadequate to make definitive statements about actual changes."

"There were no significant changes in the high-intensity end of these distributions from the 1950s through the 1990s, although the distribution from 2000 and later may differ."

The historical record of tornado counts should always be treated with care. In some states, tornado counts have doubled in the last two decades, but this may be due to non-meteorological changes. Changes in use of equipment which result in large numbers of F0 (weakest) tornadoes being recoded which previously weren't, account for this rapid change in the recent totals (see records from Illinois below). Population growth and spotter networks also increase the amount of tornadoes witnessed and reported. Death tolls are also not necessarily that useful. In May 2004, 384 tornadoes were recorded, but only 7 deaths. In 2008, only 40 tornadoes are on record, but more than 100 people were killed. The high death toll years are often a result of just several tornadoes hitting urban centres with high populations.

a)

b)

The annual number of tornadoes per year in Illinois since 1950, regardless of strength (a) and F0 only (b). Source

The more recent Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) goes on to state:

"There is insufficient evidence to determine whether trends exist in.....small-scale phenomena such as tornadoes, hail, lightning and dust-storms."

Another paper on the analysis of climate change projections suggests that the number of days during which meteorological conditions are favourable for severe storms may increase during latter decades of the 21st Century, primarily due to increased instability as a result of anthropogenic forcing. However, the research projected decreases in vertical wind shear, which as a result may oppose thermodynamic destabilization. In such a case, there may not be a discernable link between tornados and climate change, which rely on increases in wind shear to form.

In summary, more research is clearly required to better understand how ENSO and its multi-year life-cycle may influence the probability of major, destructive tornado outbreaks over the US. The relation is likely to be more complicated than the simple state of the tropical Pacific sea surface temperatures. There is a large body of knowledge rapidly evolving over the possible role of large scale climate forcing caused as a result of anthropogenic impact, on tornado outbreaks. In order for this to be more successful, efforts need to me made in linking meso-scale meteorology with global-scale climate dynamics. Watch this space...